Four-Minute vs Five-Minute vs Eight-Minute VO2max Intervals: Choosing the Right Duration
5 min read
Compare 4-, 5-, and 8-minute VO2max intervals for cycling, then use a one-week test protocol to choose the right duration for your goal.
On this page
Photo by Coen van de Broek on Unsplash.
VO2max-style intervals trade intensity, time near VO2max, and recovery cost. Choose the duration that best fits your next training goal.
VO2max intervals push hard aerobic work, but duration changes the stress you create. The right choice is not the longest rep or the hardest rep; it is the rep you can repeat with the right cost.
Photo by Munbaik Cycling Clothing on Unsplash.
VO2max-style work aims to keep you working at a high share of your aerobic ceiling. Duration, effort, and rest shape how much useful time you gain near that ceiling.
The evidence on exact interval length is not settled by one simple rule. PubMed-indexed work supports using exercise physiology, session quality, and recovery response together rather than treating one format as always best.
If you already use short on-off work, compare this guide with short repeat VO2 efforts. Those sessions can build similar stress through many brief surges instead of longer steady reps.
Longer reps can hold high oxygen demand for more of each effort.
Shorter reps often keep power steadier across the full set.
Rest length changes both power output and oxygen uptake between reps.
Judge the session by quality, not by suffering alone.
Match the rep length to the stimulus you can repeat today.
Pick the duration that delivers your target stimulus while fitting your ability to repeat high-quality reps.
Four-minute efforts let you ride very hard while still keeping the rep repeatable. They suit days when you want high power, clean pacing, and a clear stop point before form breaks.
Five-minute efforts sit in the middle. They ask you to hold the same hard aerobic work a little longer, while keeping the set easier to repeat than longer reps.
Eight-minute efforts raise the cost of each rep. They can extend time at high aerobic demand, but they also make pacing, breathing control, and recovery more important.
This is why your block design matters as much as one workout. If you need help placing these sessions, use planning high-intensity blocks before adding more hard days.
4-minute: best when you need high power and repeatable reps.
5-minute: best when you want a balanced hard-aerobic load.
8-minute: best when you need longer high-power tolerance.
Stop the set when power fades and effort spikes together.
All three durations can raise VO2max if done at adequate intensity and total time near VO2max.
Photo by yalcin arsan on Unsplash.
Data analysis is free, forever. The Dynamic Coach is Pro. Connected to Garmin, Strava, Whoop, and intervals.icu.
Choose four-minute reps when your goal is repeatable high power. This often fits short climbs, attacks, hard group rides, and races with sharp changes in speed.
Choose five-minute reps when you want one clean default. They give you enough time to settle into the effort without the same load as longer work.
Choose eight-minute reps when the goal is staying strong under longer pressure. That choice can fit sustained climbs, breakaways, and time-trial style demands better than short surges.
For a broader view of the adaptation target, pair this choice with raising your aerobic ceiling. If climbs drive your season, map the workout to specific climb power demands.
Short, punchy goal: start with four-minute reps.
Mixed goal: use five-minute reps as the first choice.
Sustained goal: move toward eight-minute reps.
If recovery lags, shorten the rep before adding rest.
Your next session should match the demand you need most.
Your race profile decides whether you value clean peak stimulus or durability under load.
A VO2max session stops being useful when the quality of work falls too far. You are no longer training the target well if power drifts, form slips, and effort climbs sharply.
Shorter reps let you stack more clean efforts with less strain per rep. Longer reps narrow the margin, so you need more respect for rest and the next day.
Use your threshold marker as a pacing guardrail, not as a fixed law. If your zones feel off, revisit field-based threshold testing before judging the interval format.
Keep the first rep controlled, not heroic.
End the set when two reps clearly fade.
Do not add extra hard work after a failed set.
Keep the next day easy if the session hits hard.
One tactical email with training ideas and product updates. No spam — unsubscribe anytime.
Keep reading
- Norwegian Threshold Method for Amateur Cyclists: Lactate-Guided Training Without a Lab — PubMed does not confirm a branded Norwegian Threshold Method. Use this conservative field protocol to set threshold work with power, heart rate, and...
- Sweet Spot Training: Maximum Gain, Sustainable Fatigue — Sweet spot training (88–94% FTP) delivers high aerobic gains with manageable fatigue—ideal for time-crunched cyclists. Learn interval design, periodi...
- Setting Cycling Training Zones: Ramp Test vs 20‑Minute FTP Test — Compare ramp tests and 20-minute FTP tests for cycling zones. Learn what each test measures, how to use the result, and how to verify FTP in training.
Use four-minute reps when you want a sharp aerobic session with clear repeatability. Ride five repeats at VO2 effort, taking equal easy recovery after each rep.
Use five-minute reps when you want the middle path. Ride four repeats at VO2 effort, taking equal easy recovery and keeping the final rep close to the first.
Use eight-minute reps when you want sustained high aerobic pressure. Ride three repeats at high aerobic power, take easy recovery, and avoid hard surges at the start.
If time is tight, do not force the longest session into a crowded week. A shorter, cleaner workout often beats rushed volume, especially for riders using time-efficient training choices.
4-minute session: 5 × 4 minutes, equal easy recovery.
5-minute session: 4 × 5 minutes, equal easy recovery.
8-minute session: 3 × 8 minutes, easy recovery between reps.
Warm up long enough that rep one is not a shock.
If you are unsure, start with five-minute reps for one week. They give enough signal to judge your pacing, breathing, and recovery without pushing the longest format first.
Move to four-minute reps when the five-minute set falls apart early. You still keep intensity, but you cut the rep length so quality can return.
Move to eight-minute reps when five-minute work feels controlled and your goal needs longer pressure. Do this only if the rest of the week can absorb the extra cost.
This is the same system logic you would use when choosing between sub-threshold and over-under work. The workout should fit the stress you need, not just the number that looks harder.
Default choice: five-minute reps for one test week.
Need cleaner power: shift to four-minute reps.
Need longer pressure: shift to eight-minute reps.
Keep only one VO2max format in the week at first.
Choose the smallest change that gives the clearest training signal.
Keep intensity, shift duration to match the system you need to develop.
Pretest, day 0: Do a steady threshold-effort check or use a recent FTP marker. Record perceived effort and note whether power drifts during hard steady work.
Day 1: Warm up, then ride 5 × 4 minutes at VO2 effort with 4 minutes easy between reps. Aim for steady power across the full set.
Day 3: Warm up, then ride 4 × 5 minutes at VO2 effort with 5 minutes easy between reps. Start slightly lower if needed to keep the last rep clean.
Day 5: Warm up, then ride 3 × 8 minutes at high aerobic power with easy recovery between reps. Focus on smooth pacing, not an all-out opening surge.
Day 7: Compare power consistency, perceived effort, recovery need, and next-day readiness. Keep the duration that gave the best stimulus-to-cost match for your goal.
Four-, five-, and eight-minute VO2max intervals all trade intensity, time near VO2max, and recovery cost. Your next move: test five-minute reps first, then shorten to four minutes for cleaner quality or lengthen to eight minutes for sustained pressure.
No. Longer reps may add sustained pressure, but they also raise pacing and recovery cost. If quality fades early, shorter reps can be the better training choice.
Use power for pacing if you have it, but keep perceived effort in the decision. Heart rate can lag during short hard reps, so it should not be the only guide.
Do not start there. Pick one format for the week, judge the response, then change duration in the next block if the goal or recovery picture calls for it.
Shorten the rep length or stop the set. The goal is repeated high-quality aerobic work, not proving you can finish poor reps.