The N+One Weekly Review: What the Algorithm Looks At and What You Should
5 min read
Learn how to use the N+One weekly review to read recent load, recovery signals, and trend direction, then choose one clear training move for the next week.
On this page
Photo by ömer faruk sezer on Unsplash.
No PubMed-indexed article matches this title. Use the weekly review to read recent load, recovery signals, and pick one clear next move.
This article stays narrow because the grounded source is a PubMed search, not a paper with methods or results. Treat the algorithm notes as a plain-language guide to common training-week review inputs, not a claim about a published N+One study.
A weekly review turns scattered ride data into one training call for the next week. It keeps you from chasing every single good or bad day.
The point is not to grade your worth as a rider. The point is to spot drift in load, recovery, and intensity before the plan loses shape.
If you want the deeper planning layer, see how N+One maps goals into a week of bike workouts. The weekly review is the shorter loop that keeps that plan lined up with what just happened.
Open the review on the same day each week.
Read trends before single workouts.
Choose one change for the next week.
Write the reason in one short note.
The weekly review turns recent load and recovery into one clear next move.
In N+One terms: the weekly review is your system's guardrail — not a verdict.
Photo by Manny Becerra on Unsplash.
The source list does not give a published formula for the N+One weekly review. So this section names common inputs, while avoiding claims about exact model weights.
A training-week review usually starts with recent work: ride time, intensity, and how sessions were spread. It may also use power, heart rate, or effort data when those fields exist.
Recovery context matters because the same workload can land differently from week to week. Sleep, soreness, and readiness notes help explain why a steady plan may now feel harder.
For a broader product view, see how N+One’s coach adapts training. If you compare tools, the key split is between a static library and coaching that changes with context.
Check recent ride duration and frequency.
Check where hard efforts sat in the week.
Add recovery notes before judging the plan.
Treat the app readout as a trend signal.
PubMed search returned no indexed article matching the exact title; direct, sourced claims are unavailable.
Data analysis is free, forever. The Dynamic Coach is Pro. Connected to Garmin, Strava, Whoop, and intervals.icu.
Numbers do not speak on their own. Pair the trend with how you felt, then make the smallest useful change.
If recent load is rising and recovery still looks steady, the plan may only need less total work. Keep the key intensity, then trim the easy filler first.
If load is rising and recovery is sliding, take stress out of the system. One less hard session often gives you a cleaner signal than changing every workout.
If load is down and recovery looks steady, the week may be ready for a focused push. This is where readiness before the next session helps keep the move grounded.
Load up, recovery steady: keep intensity.
Load up, recovery down: cut one hard day.
Load down, recovery steady: add focused work.
When unsure, change volume before intensity.
Use the review to protect the signal, not to rewrite the whole plan.
In N+One terms: keep intensity, adjust the training system around it.
One tactical email with training ideas and product updates. No spam — unsubscribe anytime.
Keep reading
- Adaptive Training Plans: Use Biology to Prevent Burnout — Adaptive training plans read your HRV, resting heart rate, sleep and training load to adjust intensity in real time. Learn practical, science-based r...
- Cranioadaptive Load Cycling: A Practical Interpretation — Interpret cranioadaptive load cycling and map it to CTL/ATL principles for adaptive load periodization and training load adaptation.
- How an AI Cycling Coach Adapts Your Training in Real Time — How an AI cycling coach uses CTL, HRV, and power to adapt sessions in real time—so you never 'fail' a plan, only choose the next right session.
Photo by Nico Knaack on Unsplash.
Keep the checklist short enough that you will use it every week. Read the trend, cross-check recovery, then pick one lever.
Start with the load direction across the recent window shown in the app. Do not let one heroic ride hide a pattern of creeping fatigue.
Next, compare sleep, soreness, and readiness notes with the same period. If those inputs are missing, say so plainly and lower your confidence.
Finally, choose between volume, intensity, or rest. For more on building weeks around real life, use adaptive planning for cycling goals.
Name the load trend: up, flat, or down.
Name the recovery trend: better, same, or worse.
Pick one lever only.
Set the plan for the next seven days.
When load rises and recovery looks fine, hold the planned hard work and reduce easy volume. Your threshold did not disappear; the system just needs space.
When load rises and recovery drops, swap the next hard ride for an easy aerobic ride. This keeps movement in the week while lowering stress.
When load falls and recovery is fine, add one focused session or stretch the long ride slightly. Keep the change small so next week’s review stays easy to read.
If recovery keeps lagging, review basics before adding more work. N+One’s view of recovery habits for cyclists can help you check what changed.
Load up, recovery OK: keep hard days and trim volume.
Load up, recovery down: replace one hard session.
Load down, recovery OK: add one focused workout.
Recovery unclear: hold the plan and gather better notes.
Ready to optimize your training.
Step 1 — Read the review: Open the weekly summary. Note whether short-term load is up, stable, or down, and note any flagged concerns.
Step 2 — Cross-check recovery: Compare sleep, soreness, and readiness notes with the recent training window. Trust steady patterns more than one noisy day.
Step 3 — Pick one lever: If load is rising and recovery is steady, keep planned intensity and cut total volume for seven days. If load is rising and recovery is worse, replace the next high-stress session with an easy endurance ride. If load is lower and recovery is steady, add one focused session or slightly extend the long ride.
Step 4 — Execute and re-evaluate: Follow the chosen plan for seven days. Re-run the weekly review, then make the next single adjustment from the new read.
No PubMed-indexed article matches this title, so do not treat the weekly review as a cited research claim. Use it as a narrow decision tool: read recent load, check recovery signals, choose one lever, and reassess after seven days.
No. It gives a structured read on recent training and recovery context. A human coach can still add judgment, especially when goals, life stress, or health concerns are complex.
Do not ignore either signal. Check whether the disagreement is one bad day or a steady trend, then make the smallest safe plan change for the next week.
Yes, if the app has other useful inputs such as ride time, heart rate, effort notes, and recovery scores. The confidence may be lower when fewer signals are available.
One change keeps the feedback loop clean. If you cut volume, change intensity, and add rest at once, next week’s review is harder to read.