Building a Cycling Season Around Two A‑Races: A Practical Macrocycle Template
5 min read
A practical macrocycle template for planning a cycling season around two A-races, including base, build, taper, bridge, and second peak guidance.
On this page
Photo by Ben Guernsey on Unsplash.
Use this practical macrocycle to structure training around two A-races while you seek literature-backed adjustments.
I could not confirm a PubMed-indexed paper that prescribes this exact two A-race macrocycle. Treat this as a coachable season template, not a peer-reviewed protocol, and use the PubMed search in the references for deeper physiology reading.
Two A-races work best when each race has one clear job in your season. Pick the events that shape your choices, not every race that feels fun or important.
For each A-race, write one main aim that can guide training choices. That aim may be a placing, a time goal, a climb result, or better execution under pressure.
Your calendar should serve those aims. If you need a wider frame first, use a full training year map before you lock the final dates.
Choose the two races that would define a successful season.
Write one main aim for each A-race.
Mark all other races as B or C events.
Protect recovery before each A-race.
Avoid chasing both peaks at once.
Photo by Uran Wang on Unsplash.
The season shape depends on how far apart the two races sit. A long gap lets you recover, rebuild, and sharpen again with less compromise.
Use a staggered shape when the first A-race comes early and the second comes much later. Use a mirrored shape when both races ask for the same kind of fitness.
A blended shape fits a short gap, where you hold key work and shed fatigue. For a deeper comparison, see ways to shape training blocks.
Staggered peaks suit a wider gap between races.
Mirrored peaks suit similar race demands.
Blended peaks suit a short gap.
Do not add a third A-race by habit.
Keep the second peak visible from week one.
Use the season shape to protect two peaks, not to chase every race.
In N+One terms: choose the shape that matches the calendar, then stop rewriting the plan every week.
I could not locate PubMed-indexed studies that exactly match the requested macrocycle title; the template is a practical coaching plan, n…
Photo by Jack Delulio on Unsplash.
Data analysis is free, forever. The Dynamic Coach is Pro. Connected to Garmin, Strava, Whoop, and intervals.icu.
Start with base work, then build toward the first race, peak, bridge, and build again. The point is not perfection; the point is a stable order of work.
Weeks 1–8 are base weeks, with steady riding, skill work, and a slow rise in load. If your base is weak, building winter aerobic fitness can help frame this first block.
Weeks 9–14 shift toward the first race, with more targeted sessions and one long ride. Week 15 is the first peak, then the bridge begins before the second build.
Weeks 20–23 rebuild race-specific work for the second A-race. Week 24 is the second taper and race week, followed by a planned reset before new goals.
Weeks 1–8: base and steady volume.
Weeks 9–14: build toward Race 1.
Week 15: taper, race, then recover.
Weeks 16–19: bridge and maintain key work.
Weeks 20–24: build, taper, and race again.
The template gives you one clear path from two race dates to weekly work.
The bridge is where many two-peak seasons drift. You are not starting over, and you are not trying to hold race week sharpness forever.
After Race 1, the first job is to reduce fatigue and bring back normal training rhythm. Keep the work light at first, then add one key session that fits Race 2.
When progress slows or legs feel flat, your threshold did not disappear. The training system around it may have shifted, so check why gains have stalled before adding more load.
Make the first post-race days easy.
Add one key session before adding two.
Keep the long ride if it supports Race 2.
Drop filler rides when fatigue rises.
Recheck the second race aim before Build 2.
In N+One terms: the bridge is a reset with intent, not a loose gap between events.
One tactical email with training ideas and product updates. No spam — unsubscribe anytime.
Keep reading
- Maximum Gains, Minimum Time — Evidence-Based Training for Busy Cyclists — Time-crunched? Use science-backed, time-efficient training (polarized, sweet spot, HIIT) plus real-time adaptation to get measurable gains without en...
- Training for Masters Cyclists (40+): Age‑Adapted Strategies for Sustainable Performance — Practical, science-based training for cyclists 40+. Learn how to preserve VO2max, fight sarcopenia, prioritise recovery, and use adaptive plans to ke...
- Adaptive Training Plans: The Science That Boosts Cycling Performance — Adaptive training plans use real-time data (power, HRV, sleep, TSB) and decision algorithms to deliver the right stimulus at the right time. Learn th...
Specificity means the hard work looks more like the race as the peak gets close. It does not mean every ride becomes a race rehearsal.
A time trial focus leans toward sustained efforts and steady pacing. A hilly road race leans toward repeated climbs and long endurance rides with harder sections.
A criterium focus leans toward jumps, corner exits, and repeated changes in speed. If power guides your plan, race execution with power can help link training targets to race choices.
Your strengths should shape the dose of each session. A rider who does not know their profile can use power-based rider profiling before picking the main workout theme.
Time trial: hold steady race-like efforts.
Hilly road race: repeat climbs under control.
Criterium: train jumps and speed changes.
Keep one easy day after key intensity.
Match sessions to the A-race, not the group ride.
A two-peak season fails when every tired day becomes a new plan. Use simple checks, then make one change for a set window.
Track sleep, mood, leg feel, and how normal power feels at a normal effort. If sleep is the main limiter, start with protecting sleep for recovery before adding more training stress.
If fatigue keeps building, keep intensity touches but cut volume for several days. Do not cut everything at once unless illness, injury, or a clinician’s advice requires that choice.
Some riders need more context than a fixed template can give. That is where adaptive peak planning can help align the next week with the rider in front of you.
Use the same daily checks each morning.
Cut volume before removing all intensity.
Hold the change for a clear window.
Reassess before adding missed work back.
Seek clinical help for health concerns.
Keep the decision simple so two peaks stay possible.
In N+One terms: if the system drifts, make one clear change, hold it, then reassess.
Weeks 1–8 — Base: Build a steady riding rhythm, grow endurance within your normal range, and keep one or two quality touches each week without frequent maximal efforts.
Weeks 9–14 — Build 1: Shift toward Race 1 needs with two focused intensity sessions each week, while keeping one long ride and enough easy riding to absorb the work.
Week 15 — Taper and Race 1: Reduce volume, keep a few short sharp efforts, race, then schedule several easy days before the bridge starts.
Weeks 16–19 — Bridge: Recover first, then bring back one race-relevant quality session each week while steering training toward the second A-race.
Weeks 20–23 — Build 2: Rebuild specific intensity for Race 2, keep the long ride, and protect at least one true recovery day each week.
Week 24 — Taper and Race 2: Repeat the taper pattern that worked for Race 1, execute the second race, then plan a recovery block before offseason choices.
Use this practical macrocycle to structure training around two A-races while you seek literature-backed adjustments: choose the two race dates, define one aim for each, and build the year around base, build, peak, bridge, build, and peak.
I could not verify a PubMed-indexed study that prescribes this exact template. Use it as a practical planning model, then review the PubMed search in the references for literature-backed adjustments.
Use a blended peak. Recover briefly after the first race, keep one key intensity touch, and avoid a full rebuild that adds too much fatigue.
Only if the race supports the second peak. Treat most mid-season events as practice, not as another full target that changes the plan.
Write the two A-race dates on your calendar, then count backward to place the second build and bridge before you change any workouts.